首页> 外文OA文献 >A new simplified method and its verification for calculation of consolidation settlement of a clayey soil with creep
【2h】

A new simplified method and its verification for calculation of consolidation settlement of a clayey soil with creep

机译:计算黏土蠕变固结沉降的简化方法及其验证

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The calculation of the consolidation settlement of clayey soils with creep behaviour has been a challenging issue with a long history. After a brief review the assumptions made in the two methods based on Hypothesis A and Hypothesis B, the authors present a new simplified hypothesis B method for calculation of consolidation settlement of a clayey soil with creep. Equations of this method are derived based on the “equivalent time” concept for different stress–strain states. This simplified Hypothesis B method is then used to calculate the consolidation settlement of a number of typical consolidation problems. The approximation and verification of this simplified method are examined by comparing the calculated settlements with settlements computed using two fully coupled finite element (FE) consolidation analysis programs using elastic viscoplastic (EVP) constitutive models (Hypothesis B) and the Hypothesis A method. It is found that the curves calculated using the new Hypothesis B simplified method with a factor α = 0.8 are close to curves from two FE model simulations with relative errors in the range 0.37%~8.42% only for three layers of Hong Kong marine clay (HKMC). In overall, the settlements calculated using Hypothesis A method are smaller than those from the two FE simulations with relative error in the range 6.52%~46.17% for the three layers of HKMC. In addition, this new simplified Hypothesis B method is used to calculate the average strain of consolidation tests done by Berre and Iversen in 1972. The calculated results are compared with the test data, and values from a fully coupled finite difference (FD) consolidation analysis using Yin and Graham’s EVP constitutive model (Hypothesis B), and Hypothesis A method. It is found that, again, the results from the new simplified Hypothesis B method are very close to the measured data. In conclusion, the new simplified Hypothesis B method is a suitable simple method, by spread-sheet calculation of the consolidation settlement of a single layer of a clayey soil with creep.
机译:具有蠕变行为的黏性土固结沉降的计算一直是一个具有挑战性的问题,历史悠久。在简要回顾了基于假设A和假设B的两种方法的假设之后,作者提出了一种新的简化假设B方法,用于计算具有蠕变的黏性土的固结沉降。该方法的方程式是基于“等效时间”概念针对不同应力-应变状态得出的。然后,使用这种简化的假设B方法来计算许多典型合并问题的合并结算。通过比较计算的沉降量和使用弹性粘塑性(EVP)本构模型(假设B)和假设A方法的两个完全耦合有限元(FE)固结分析程序计算的沉降量,来检验此简化方法的近似性和验证性。结果发现,使用新的假设B简化方法计算的系数为α= 0.8的曲线接近于两个有限元模型模拟的曲线,相对误差仅为0.37%〜8.42%(仅适用于三层香港海洋黏土)( HKMC)。总体而言,使用假设A方法计算的沉降量要小于两次有限元模拟的沉降量,HKMC的三层的相对误差在6.52%〜46.17%之间。此外,这种新的简化的假设B方法用于计算Berre和Iversen在1972年进行的固结测试的平均应变。将计算结果与测试数据进行比较,并采用完全耦合有限差分(FD)固结分析的值使用Yin和Graham的EVP本构模型(假设B)和假设A方法。再次发现,新的简化的假设B方法的结果与实测数据非常接近。总之,通过对单层含蠕变黏土的固结沉降进行扩展计算,新的简化的假设B方法是一种合适的简单方法。

著录项

  • 作者

    Yin, JH; Feng, WQ;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2017
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 en
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号